Insanity or AIsanity?

Recently I have noticed a terrible shift in academic environment around the world. Since the public release of the ChatGPT in November 2022, lecturers and students both have been abusing AI and this trend continues to grow today.

At this point the educational flow looks like this:

AI Creates/Updates Assignment for lecturers ––> AI analyzes assignment for students––> AI completes assigment for students ––> AI checks for AI with AI detector tools (this is ridiculous at this point) ––> AI checks when Assignments is submitted ––> (Additionally, but widely used nowadays) AI marks assignments for lecturers

This is insanity. Or should we rather call it AIsanity? Goverments and educational institutions have to take action until we start to only teach AI, not ourselves.

This should definitely take another turn. Consider that people get payed not for their job really, but to use AI, and students pay not to gain real knowledge, but rather how to use AI to complete assignments and how to avoid being caught when using AI.

Especially considering that these AI detectors are shamelessly dumb due to the limitations of algorithms they use and patterns they look at. Professionally-written text can now be flagged as AI and wrongly panished even if it was written by human, especially in law or business schools, or highly technical streams, where writing patterns may match AI models' style (considering that AI models are trained on these texts in the first place!)

I genuenly hope this can and will take different direction. Maybe not completely opposite to avoid radicality, but at least reasonably chosen and the one to be called AI usage avoidance or somewhat similar.